The Dialectics of Art from ‘Spirit’ to Freedom

Authors

Keywords:

Art, spirit, dialectics, freedom, mimesis

Abstract

In the Frankfurt School and its member Adorno, art along with philosophy, is seen as a field of activity that allows freedom in the current historical-social conditions. In this sense, art in Frankfurt School, is defined as an area of resistance to current capitalist system. What makes art a field of resistance is the ‘spirit’ moment that work of art has and is inherent in the work of art. Spirit in a work of art is the element that emerges in spiritualization process of art. Although the spiritualization of art is a process of rationalization as the exclusion of natural beauty from art, it is a process that creates also an opposite spiritualization. The spirit that emerges in the dialectical process of the spiritualization of art, which is the repetition of the dialectics of the Englightenment in art, is a momentary liberation and subject’s experience of freedom from conceptual oppression and therefore from the domination of the holistic society. Because, contrary to the rationalization, subjectivation and freedom process of human being which has resulted in reification, art finds its origin in a natural impulse, behavior, that is mimesis.

References

Adorno, T. W. (2016). Negatif Diyalektik. (Ş. Öztürk, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.

Adorno, T. W. (2002). Aesthetic theory. G. Adorno & R. Tiedemann, (Ed.), Robert Hullot-Kentor (newly Ed. and trans.). Continuum.

Adorno, T. W. (2017). Minima moralia: Sakatlanmış yaşamdan yansımalar. (O. Koçak ve A. Doğukan, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.

Benhabib, S. (2005). Eleştiri, norm ve ütopya: Eleştirel Teori’nin temellerine dair bir inceleme. (İ. Tekerek, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları.

Bernstein, J. M. (1992). Fate of art: Aesthetic alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. Padstow: T J Press.

Gülenç, K. (2015). Frankfurt Okulu: Eleştiri, toplum ve bilim. Ayrıntı Yayınları.

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T.W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (Edmund Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford Universıty Press.

Horkheimer, M. (2013). Akıl tutulması. (O. Koçak, Çev.). Metis Yayınları.

Jay, M. (2014). Diyalektik imgelem: Frankfurt Okulu’nun tarihi ve çalışmaları[1923-1950] (S. Doğan, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.

Kant, I. (1784). Aydınlanma nedir?. (Nejat Bozkurt, Çev.). Felsefe yazıları (1983).

Noppen, P-F. (2017). Adorno on mimetic rationality: Three puzzles. Adorno Studies, 1(1), 80-100.

O’Conner, B. (2022). Adorno (S. Soysal, (Çev.). Alfa.

Reijen, W. (1999). Adorno: Bir giriş. (M. Cemal, Çev.). Belge Uluslararası Yayıncılık.

Ross, N. (2015). “The polarity informing mimesis”: The social import of mimesis in Benjamin and Adorno. In N. Ross (Ed.), The Aesthetic Ground of Critical Theory: New Readings of Benjamin and Adorno (pp. 67-79). Rowman & Littlefield.

Ross, N. (2017). The Philosophy and politics of aesthetic experience: German Romanticism and Critical Theory. Springer Nature.

Sherratt, Y. (2007). Adorno’s aesthetic concept of Aura. Philosophy & Social Criticism 33(2), 155-177.

Singh, S. (2017). The spiritualization of art in Adorno’s aesthetic theory. Adorno Studies, 1(1), 32-42.

Wellmer, A. (2007). Truth, semblance and reconciliation: Adorno’s aesthetic redemption of modernity. In A. Wellmer (Ed.), The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics and Postmodernism (D. Midgley, trans.). Polity Press.

Published

27.12.2023

How to Cite

KAYA, E. (2023). The Dialectics of Art from ‘Spirit’ to Freedom. POLITIKOS: Journal of Social and Political Philosophy , 2(1), 28–39. Retrieved from https://politikos.org/ojs/index.php/content/article/view/25

Issue

Section

Articles